_Remembering / Providing / Resisting. Eugenio espinoza + Andrés Michelena_ at CCE, Miami

Remembering / Providing / Resisting is a tandem project by Eugenio Espinoza (Venezuela, 1950) and Andrés Michelena (Venezuela, 1963) presented at the Spanish Cultural Center in Miami (CCEM) until May 17, 2013.

_Remembering / Providing / Resisting. Eugenio espinoza + Andrés Michelena_ at CCE, Miami

The project is supervised by Canary curator and semiotician Roc Laseca, PhD in Art Theory, and counts with the collaboration of CIFO - The Cisneros Fontanals Art Foundation, which has generously granted part of its collection for the exhibit.

The CCEM will present on May 8th at 7pm the encounter “La forma y el Deseo” (The Shape and the Desire), a public and free “laboratory” or seminar about a reflection on the tempered modernity in Venezuela with the specialists Jesús Fuenmayor (CIFO´s director), Jorge L. Gutiérrez (promoter of visual arts), José Antonio Navarrete (independent curator), along with the artist Eugenio Espinoza and Andrés Michelena, under the coordination of Roc Laseca.

The project includes the site-specific works by Eugenio Espinoza ('The Exhibitionist', 2013) and by Andrés Michelena ('Countervision', 2013) as well as a documentary film produced in collaboration with Arevalo Gallery.

Remembering / Providing / Resisting is an exercise of correspondence between these two Venezuelan authors on the viral, critical and political behavior of experimentation with the legacy of drawing and painting abstraction. Through its radical mise-en-scène, the project seeks to reconnect the ways in which the experiment of drawing and painting abstraction constitutes a subversion of the modernist canon.

Historiographically, peripheral art practices seem to have been assigned the contextualization of those developments in art theory being proposed from the 'hegemonic centers of visuality' (Nelly Richard, N. Garcia-Cancilini, dixit). Yet there is a vindication of their socio-political implications, typical of a human economy that does not ignore the productive, relational practices of specific contexts on which it operates. Romantic and emancipatory modernity autism is gone, along with the areas of knowledge that barely tie their socio-political consequences.

Does it mean that the modern exercise was reduced into a will to separate discourses from humans, language from the Earth, and build efficient emancipatory veils that seemed to distinguish and put in order the different world spheres when, de facto, human network is interconnected, inextricable, and common? Will the crisis of modernity end up into a failure of its visual, “scopic” regimes, through the ways it used to produce revolutionary myths and, mainly, areas of emancipation where those myths could take place? Thinking about it –experiencing it- means remembering, providing, resisting.